Tag Archives: neti-neti

The Practice of Negation

  1. Introduction: The Method of Negation

Every authentic encounter with the Absolute begins not with affirmation, but with a stripping away. The ultimate reality—whether named as the Unborn, Brahman, or Absolute Nothingness—cannot be approached by concepts, images, or affirmations. To affirm is already to fall into limitation, for affirmation binds Being to a predicate, and predicates belong to the world of phenomena. Affirmation assumes distinction: this is true, that is false; this is real, that is not. But the Absolute stands prior to all distinctions, prior to the very duality of “is” and “is not.” read more

Posted in The Unborn and the Absolute: Unborn Mind Zen and Advaita Vedānta in Dialogue | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Brahman and Absolute Nothingness in Advaita

The Opening Invocation of Brahman

To speak of Brahman is already to fall short. In the Advaita Vedānta tradition, Brahman is the infinite, eternal, unchanging reality that underlies and transcends all phenomena. The Upaniṣads describe it not as an object of thought, not as something to be grasped through senses or concepts, but as pure being-consciousness-bliss (sat–cit–ānanda). Yet even these words are provisional; the sages warn that Brahman is beyond predicate, beyond category, beyond affirmation, and even beyond negation. read more

Posted in The Unborn and the Absolute: Unborn Mind Zen and Advaita Vedānta in Dialogue | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 3 Comments

The Unborn and the Absolute: Unborn Mind Zen and Advaita Vedānta in Dialogue

Introduction

In the contemporary spiritual landscape, it has become common for seekers and writers to conflate Unborn Mind Zen with Advaita Vedānta, as though the two traditions were simply different doors opening into the same room. This conflation, while well-intentioned, obscures the radical distinctions that separate them. The purpose of this series is not to merge, harmonize, or reduce one to the other, but to clarify their differences with precision, so that the adept may avoid the pitfalls of false equivalence and instead walk their chosen path with clear eyes. read more

Posted in The Unborn and the Absolute: Unborn Mind Zen and Advaita Vedānta in Dialogue | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Sessions with Grok

This category will be exploring Unborn Mind discussions with Grok (a generative artificial intelligence chatbot developed by xAI) read more

Posted in Sessions with Grok, Spirituality | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

True Virginity

As was announced earlier in this series, the phrase “knowing as he was not” is indicative of mystical virginity—being lathered in imagelessness and thus freed from all that is not the Godhead; principally, all that is prior to conception. If there is a religion in the Unborn, imagelessness is its creed. The source of this vision is Eckhart’s Sermon Eight, as listed in the Complete Mystical Works of Meister Eckhart. read more

Posted in Meister Eckhart | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Choose Not…

The Way of the Unborn is not burdensome
Just let-go of partiality
Be neither positive nor negative
Stay illumined
If you are off by a hairsbreadth
Nirvana and samsara are infinitely divided read more

Posted in Hsin Hsin Ming | Tagged , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Wu-Wei

30. “If you now set about using your minds to seek Mind, listening to the teaching of others, and hoping to reach the goal through mere learning, when will you ever succeed? Some of the ancients had sharp minds; they no sooner heard the Doctrine proclaimed than they hastened to discard all learning. So they were called ‘Sages who, abandoning learning, have come to rest in spontaneity’.1 In these days people only seek to stuff themselves with knowledge and deductions, seeking everywhere for book-knowledge and calling this ‘Dharma-practice’.2 They do not know that so much knowledge and deduction have just the contrary effect of piling up obstacles. Merely acquiring a lot of knowledge makes you like a child who gives himself indigestion by gobbling too much curds. Those who study the Way according to the Three Vehicles are all like this. All you can call them is people who suffer from indigestion. When so-called knowledge and deductions are not digested, they become poisons, for they belong only to the plane of samsara. In the Absolute, there is nothing at all of this kind. So it is said: ‘In the armoury of my sovereign, there is no Sword of Thusness’. All the concepts you have formed in the past must be discarded and replaced by void. Where dualism ceases, there is the Void of the Womb of Tathagatas. The term ‘Womb of Tathagatas’ implies that not the smallest hairsbreadth of anything can exist there. That is why the Dharma Raja (the Buddha}, who broke down the notion of objective existence, manifested himself in this world, and that is why he said: ‘When I was with Dipamkara Buddha there was not a particle of anything for me to attain.’ This saying is intended just to void your sense-based knowledge and deductions. Only he who restrains every vestige of empiricism and ceases to rely upon anything can become a perfectly tranquil man. The canonical teachings of the Three Vehicles are just remedies for temporary needs. They were taught to meet such needs and so are of temporary value and differ one from another. If only this could be understood, there would be no more doubts about it. Above all it is essential not to select some particular teaching suited to a certain occasion, and, being impressed by its forming part of the written canon, regard it as an immutable concept. Why so? Because in truth there is no unalterable Dharma which the Tathagata could have preached. People of our sect would never argue that there could be such a thing. We just know how to put all mental activity to rest and thus achieve tranquillity. We certainly do not begin by thinking things out and end up in perplexity.” read more

Posted in The Zen Teachings of Huang Po, Zen | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment